27
Aug

bull

   Posted by: rads   in fable

BS* version

Jane and Jack are leading negotiations. The 2 groups face off. It was a merger they sought. So each could benefit from the other.

Jane: Here’s what’s on the table. Bundling our top 5 products and allowing ourselves to trail back during the kickoff and merge.

Jack: It’s attractive alright. Just not sure if we’d want to move forward with it. We want to scale back, running low on bandwidth. So, our best offer is a match on the top 3 product lines.

Silence

Huddle at Jane’s corner: So what do you think?

Crap! He just pulled a Boulwarism* ?!
Can’t pass up on the merge, not now.
Long term strategic planning is the mantra.
Clearly, there’s a disconnect!?
Are we even on the same page?
Isn’t this a CLM*, at least for him?
And we do all the heavy lifting?

Consensus.

Negotiations re-open.

Jane: Jack, here’s what we will do. Q2′s been a rough ride, but Q3 and Q4 looks good from our place. We will offer the same 3 products as you wanted. We’ll even throw in the extras with no commitment from you, and do the grunt work. Risking a winner’s curse* with this in a way.
Jack, this is a win-win. What do you think?

Silence

Jack: We can’t decide. Yet. Circle back later?

!!?!?

* BS = Business Speak.
*Boulwarism = Take it or leave it offer
*CLM = Career limiting move
* winner’s curse = An immediate acceptance of offer, though the ‘winner’ doesn’t get a good deal out of it.

This entry was posted on Monday, August 27th, 2007 at 3:08 pm and is filed under fable. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

5 comments so far

The Pilgrim
 1 

Jane should not lead any more negotiations!

August 27th, 2007 at 7:36 pm
rads
 2 

lol, me think that too. But for argument’s sake, let’s take it a notch.
Why?

August 27th, 2007 at 7:51 pm
A Muser
 3 

Problem’s with Jack. He’s either indecisive or isn’t in the position to make the decision for the company. Maybe he’s just plain dumb? BTW, you’ve received the Sex Tag! ;)))

August 28th, 2007 at 6:47 pm
rads
 4 

Thanks Muser, one voice for the female at least! :D

A sex tag? You so have the wrong person, but for the benefit of blogkind, I guess I will have to do it. The tag I mean! :-p

August 28th, 2007 at 8:21 pm
Ok
 5 

This falls beyond my area of expertise. Anyway going by your past record I will give you the benefit of doubt;). So, nice:).

August 29th, 2007 at 3:16 pm

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment