Hehehehee!! Good job, Rads! Am I to assume you have three kiddos? For some reason, I thought you had two…

a muser:

you are forgetting the biggest kid of them all (as v.b. reminded me yesterday … or was it today?)!

- s.b.

Excellent! I know pretty much every woman who is either married or in banking say that. Though I try and make it different for myself. If I get married ie. Else, I’d just be enjoying the good, daring, kinky, adventurous fireworks in the rather noisy celebrations.

d.s.:

when provided with a sliding scale of diminishing returns, you need to use basic laws of supply and demand to determine your very own personal (or dual) state of equilibrium.

rads:

terri might want to adapt the above “manager speak” to segue nicely into this tag, eh? else, she will have to really ask everyone to subscribe to the theory of immaculate conception, twice over!

- s.b.

Good one. Last paragraph was really funny :))<br/>By any chance you mean to say people need to be independent, err self dependent after kids? :P

KC – come Jan, you aren’t a little kid no more, so a little knowledge doesn’t hurt :p

Ferrari – Thanks :)
See, look at it this way, the person’s there so no reason for self-dependancy. It’s more of a question of “do we have to”?

Muni – Everyday?! That’s ew, not aw. ;-)

sb – I sure hope she does. She just has to make it cryptic enough for us to get and her folks not to. ;-)

He! He! Yeah tell me abt it and what how many do I have?!

ok – aw alright, will make the next one G. Would mushy work? :)

madsies – ;-)

usha – that’s a lil consolation!
Maybe coz I speak of them in a pair. They are 17 mths apart, so almost-twins works :)

did not realise my tag would travel so fast and so far. loved your attempt at it!